

AI Prompting For Educators
Welcome our Prompt-Ed Toolkit, a practical, classroom-ready resource that helps educators use AI tools like Gemini safely, efficiently, and creatively to enhance instruction while keeping the essential human work of teaching at the center. Below, you’ll find plug-and-play prompt templates, best practices, privacy reminders, and structured formats (like XML) that produce predictable, standards-aligned outputs.
This toolkit offers ready-to-use prompts for lesson planning, assessment design, differentiation, writing tasks, creative projects, ESL support, homework redesign, parent communication, and more—all aligned with COPPA, FERPA, and AI-use that encourages responsible AI use from our students.
Think of this as a professional assistant that helps you save time, personalize instruction, support diverse learners, and design AI-resistant assignments. Everything is customizable. The goal is simple: equip teachers with practical tools that strengthen learning, reduce workload, and promote safe, transparent, responsible AI use for our students.
The following prompts showcase the potential of AI in education and are meant to spark your own creative ideas. Dive in, experiment, and see how AI can enhance your teaching practice and benefit your students.
| AI is only as good as the mind evaluating it. Without critical thinking, even the strongest models become mirrors for our blind spots. The danger isn’t that AI thinks for us, but that we stop thinking about what it produces. |
Directions for using prompt templates:
- Cut and paste the following prompts into Gemini, then replace each bracket with the pertinent information.
- As you discover effective prompts, save them for future use. Create a personal collection organized by subject, grade level, or task type. This can be as simple as a document on your computer or a note-taking app. Share your working list with colleagues.
- While prewritten prompts are helpful, don’t hesitate to modify them to fit your specific needs. Adjust the language, add context relevant to your class, or combine elements from different prompts.
Best Practices, Safety & Privacy
✔ 1. FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act)
Rule: If it identifies a student, do not enter it. Do NOT enter: student names, student email addresses, identifiable work samples, IEP/504 details.
✔ 2. COPPA (Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act)
Rule: Students under 13 cannot use external AI tools without explicit clearance.
✔ 3. District-Approved Tools
Rule: Teachers must use AI tools vetted under district data governance policy, vendor contracts, and privacy agreements.
✔ 4. Check for Bias & Accuracy
Rule: AI isn’t perfect. It might produce biased or incorrect information. Always review before sharing with students.
✔ 5. Trust Your Judgment
Let AI handle the initial draft, then check for accuracy and add your domain expertise. Use AI as a starting point, and not the final solution.
Top 5 Essential Elements for Every Prompt
Consider including the following in every AI prompt to ensure the output is accurate, aligned, differentiated, and easy to refine. These are universal guardrails that dramatically improve results, no matter the subject or grade level.
1. Define the AI’s Role + Audience + Classroom Context. Tell the AI who it is and who the students are to guarantee developmental appropriateness. Example: “You are an expert 9th grade biology teacher supporting mixed-ability learners.”
2. State the Learning Objective + AI Use Tier. This sets the instructional target and the ethical boundaries. Example: “Learning goal: Analyze cell processes. AI Use Tier 3 (planning only).”
3. Require Differentiation (Emerging → On-Level → Advanced → ELL). This transforms AI into a built-in accommodation tool. Example: “Provide versions for emerging, proficient, advanced, and multilingual learners.”
4. Ask for Clarifying Questions. Prevents misalignment and ensures custom-fit output. Example: “Ask me 2–4 clarifying questions before generating the final product.”
5. Require AI to Double-Check it’s work and Self-Check for Accuracy, Alignment, and Accessibility. Reduces errors, hallucinations, and off-level content. Example: “Before finalizing, double-check factual accuracy, standards alignment, accessibility, and internal consistency.”
*Bonus: Consider adding the following RedLine language to your prompts:
- Do NOT generate full student work.
- Do NOT fabricate facts, sources, data, quotes, or research.
- Do NOT bypass district AI Use Tiers.
- Do NOT include or analyze personally identifiable student information (PII).
- Do NOT write content that undermines academic integrity.
- Do NOT produce unsafe, developmentally inappropriate, or biased content.
- Do NOT provide copyrighted text longer than 90 characters.
- Do NOT ignore clarifying questions or skip the self-check requirement.
Elements to Include in Every Prompt: Copy-Paste
Short Version (for fast prompting):
1. You are an expert [GRADE LEVEL] [SUBJECT] teacher; use developmentally appropriate language.
2. Align everything to this learning objective + AI Use Tier [#]: [OBJECTIVE].
3. Provide emerging, proficient, advanced, and multilingual learner versions.
4. Ask me 2–4 clarifying questions before you begin.
5. Self-check accuracy, alignment, accessibility, and consistency before
Extended Version for Clarity:
1. ROLE + CONTEXT
- You are an expert [GRADE LEVEL] [SUBJECT] teacher.
- Audience: mixed-ability students, including emerging, proficient, advanced, SPED, and multilingual learners.
- Use developmentally appropriate language and instructional practices.
2. LEARNING OBJECTIVE + AI USE TIER
- Align all content to this learning objective: [INSERT OBJECTIVE OR STANDARD].
- Follow AI Use Tier [#]:
- Allowed: [INSERT]
- Not allowed: [INSERT]
- Ensure the final product reinforces ethical, transparent AI use.
3. DIFFERENTIATION
Provide four versions of all student-facing materials:
- Emerging learners (more scaffolds)
- Proficient learners (grade-level expectations)
- Advanced/Honors learners (extension or deeper reasoning)
- Multilingual learners (clear language, supports, sentence frames)
4. CLARIFYING QUESTIONS
Before generating the final output, ask me 2–4 clarifying questions about:
- content emphasis
- reading level
- accessibility needs
- task expectations
Wait for my answers.
5. SELF-CHECK
Before finalizing, review your own work for:
- factual accuracy
- alignment to the stated objective
- grade-level readability
- accessibility and clarity
- internal consistency
- state any limitations or areas the teacher should double-check
After confirming and clarifying answers, produce the final polished version.
Quick Start (Basic Prompt)
You are an expert [GRADE LEVEL] [SUBJECT] teacher.
Create a [QUIZ / TEST / EXIT TICKET] with [NUMBER] questions on [TOPIC], aligned to the following:
Learning Objective: [INSERT OBJECTIVE]
Standards: [INSERT STANDARD(S)]
Include:
- 3 recall items
- 3 application items
- 3 analysis or evaluation items
- 1–2 items addressing common misconceptions
- At least 2 multi-select or partial-credit items
- A complete answer key with student-friendly explanations
- Notes explaining what each item reveals about student understanding
Before generating the assessment, ask me 2–3 clarifying questions.
Before finalizing, self-check for accuracy, alignment, grade-level appropriateness, and accessibility.
Customize & Extend
Role & Audience
You are an expert [GRADE LEVEL] [SUBJECT] teacher designing a high-quality, developmentally appropriate assessment.
The audience includes mixed-ability students: [emerging, proficient, advanced, multilingual learners, and students with accommodations].
Class Context
Use the following context to guide your design:
- Unit or topic: [INSERT]
- Prior learning students have completed: [INSERT]
- Common misconceptions (if known): [OPTIONAL]
- Curriculum or resources used: [TEXTBOOK, LABS, VIDEOS, ETC.]
Learning Objectives & Standards
Align all items to:
- Learning objective(s): [INSERT]
- Standard(s): [INSERT]
AI Use Boundaries
AI may be used for teacher planning, item drafting, rationales, and accessibility supports.
Do not generate student responses or include any personally identifiable student information.
Assessment Requirements
Design a [QUIZ / TEST / EXIT TICKET / CFA] that:
- Takes approximately [TIME] minutes
- Assesses understanding of [TOPIC]
- Uses clear, student-friendly language
- Avoids trick questions or unnecessary complexity
Include:
- Recall, application, and analysis-level questions
- Items targeting common misconceptions
- Consistent formatting and clearly described visuals (in brackets if needed)
Answer Key & Teacher Insight
Provide:
- Correct answers
- Student-friendly rationales
- What each item reveals about student thinking
- 2–3 intervention ideas for students who struggle
- 2–3 enrichment ideas for students who demonstrate mastery
Clarifying Questions (Required)
Ask 3–4 clarifying questions before generating the assessment related to:
- Content emphasis
- Reading level
- Assessment format
- Accessibility needs
Wait for responses before generating the final assessment.
Self-Check
Before finalizing, review for:
- Accuracy
- Alignment to objectives and standards
- Developmental appropriateness
- Accessibility and clarity
- Bias or misleading wording
State any limitations the teacher should review.
Differentiation & Accessibility (Optional Add-Ons)
Create differentiated versions as needed:
- Emerging learners: simplified wording, shorter question stems, guided supports
- Proficient learners: standard grade-level version
- Advanced learners: deeper reasoning, multi-step tasks
- Multilingual learners: glossaries, sentence frames, simplified syntax, visual supports
- SPED / LD: limit reading load per question, avoid double negatives, flag items that may need read-aloud or visual support
- Honors / AP: increase complexity of analysis/evaluation items and include one “justify your reasoning” short-answer item
Accessibility & UDL requirements (optional):
Incorporate accessibility features such as:
- alt text for visuals
- chunked question groups
- predictable formatting
- reduced cognitive load
- optional read-aloud-friendly version
Advanced (XML Format)
<pre><code>
<assessment_prompt version="1.0">
<role_and_audience>
<role>You are an expert [GRADE LEVEL] [SUBJECT] teacher designing a high-quality, developmentally appropriate assessment.</role>
<audience>
<description>Mixed-ability students including emerging, proficient, advanced, multilingual learners, and students with accommodations.</description>
<learner_groups>
<group>emerging</group>
<group>proficient</group>
<group>advanced</group>
<group>multilingual_learners</group>
<group>students_with_accommodations</group>
</learner_groups>
</audience>
</role_and_audience>
<class_context>
<unit_or_topic>[INSERT]</unit_or_topic>
<prior_learning_completed>[INSERT]</prior_learning_completed>
<common_misconceptions optional="true">[OPTIONAL]</common_misconceptions>
<curriculum_or_resources_used>[TEXTBOOK, LABS, VIDEOS, READINGS, TOOLS, ETC.]</curriculum_or_resources_used>
</class_context>
<learning_objectives_and_standards>
<learning_objectives>[INSERT]</learning_objectives>
<standards>[INSERT]</standards>
</learning_objectives_and_standards>
<ai_use_expectations>
<selected_ai_tier>[Insert Tier]</selected_ai_tier>
<approved_ai_actions>
<!-- Paste ONLY the allowed AI actions associated with the selected tier -->
<action>[PASTE ALLOWED ACTION]</action>
<action>[PASTE ALLOWED ACTION]</action>
<action>[PASTE ALLOWED ACTION]</action>
</approved_ai_actions>
<tier_alignment_instruction>
Design the assessment so student AI use is strictly limited to the approved actions above and clearly communicated in student-facing directions (if relevant).
</tier_alignment_instruction>
</ai_use_expectations>
<assessment_requirements>
<assessment_type>[QUIZ / TEST / EXIT_TICKET / CFA]</assessment_type>
<target_time_minutes>[TIME]</target_time_minutes>
<topic_or_focus>[TOPIC]</topic_or_focus>
<design_constraints>
<constraint>Use clear, student-friendly language.</constraint>
<constraint>Avoid trick questions or unnecessary complexity.</constraint>
<constraint>Use consistent formatting.</constraint>
<constraint>Describe visuals clearly in brackets if needed (e.g., [diagram shows…]).</constraint>
</design_constraints>
<cognitive_demand>
<include_levels>
<level>recall</level>
<level>application</level>
<level>analysis</level>
</include_levels>
<notes optional="true">[OPTIONAL: additional guidance on cognitive demand distribution]</notes>
</cognitive_demand>
<misconceptions_targeting>
<include_items_targeting_common_misconceptions>true</include_items_targeting_common_misconceptions>
<notes optional="true">[OPTIONAL: list misconceptions to target]</notes>
</misconceptions_targeting>
<item_format_preferences optional="true">
<formats>
<format>multiple_choice</format>
<format>short_answer</format>
<format>constructed_response</format>
<format>true_false</format>
<format>matching</format>
</formats>
<notes>[OPTIONAL: specify preferred formats or constraints]</notes>
</item_format_preferences>
<accessibility_and_udl optional="true">
<requirements>
<requirement>Chunk question groups where appropriate.</requirement>
<requirement>Use predictable formatting and headings.</requirement>
<requirement>Reduce unnecessary reading load.</requirement>
<requirement>Provide read-aloud-friendly version if needed.</requirement>
<requirement>Provide alt-text-like descriptions for visuals.</requirement>
</requirements>
<accommodations_notes>[OPTIONAL: specific accommodations to consider]</accommodations_notes>
</accessibility_and_udl>
</assessment_requirements>
<deliverables>
<assessment>
<instructions_for_students>
<include>brief_directions</include>
<include>time_guidance_optional</include>
<include>allowed_tools_optional</include>
</instructions_for_students>
<items>
<!-- The AI should output the full set of items here -->
<item>
<item_id>1</item_id>
<type>[MCQ / SA / CR / etc.]</type>
<standard_or_objective_alignment>[INSERT]</standard_or_objective_alignment>
<prompt_text>[INSERT QUESTION TEXT]</prompt_text>
<visuals optional="true">[INSERT VISUAL DESCRIPTION OR NONE]</visuals>
<answer_choices optional="true">
<choice>A. [INSERT]</choice>
<choice>B. [INSERT]</choice>
<choice>C. [INSERT]</choice>
<choice>D. [INSERT]</choice>
</answer_choices>
<difficulty_or_depth optional="true">[recall/application/analysis]</difficulty_or_depth>
<targets_misconception optional="true">[yes/no + which misconception]</targets_misconception>
</item>
</items>
</assessment>
<answer_key_and_teacher_insight>
<answer_key>
<key_item>
<item_id>1</item_id>
<correct_answer>[INSERT]</correct_answer>
<student_friendly_rationale>[INSERT]</student_friendly_rationale>
</key_item>
</answer_key>
<what_items_reveal>
<insight>
<item_id>1</item_id>
<reveals_about_thinking>[INSERT]</reveals_about_thinking>
</insight>
</what_items_reveal>
<interventions>
<idea>[INSERT 1]</idea>
<idea>[INSERT 2]</idea>
<idea>[INSERT 3]</idea>
</interventions>
<enrichment>
<idea>[INSERT 1]</idea>
<idea>[INSERT 2]</idea>
<idea>[INSERT 3]</idea>
</enrichment>
</answer_key_and_teacher_insight>
</deliverables>
<clarifying_questions required="true">
<instruction>
Ask 3–4 clarifying questions before generating the final assessment related to:
content emphasis; reading level; assessment format; and accessibility needs.
Wait for responses before generating the final assessment.
</instruction>
<question_count>3-4</question_count>
<topics>
<topic>content_emphasis</topic>
<topic>reading_level</topic>
<topic>assessment_format</topic>
<topic>accessibility_needs</topic>
</topics>
</clarifying_questions>
<self_check>
<review_for>
<check>Accuracy</check>
<check>Alignment to objectives and standards</check>
<check>Developmental appropriateness</check>
<check>Accessibility and clarity</check>
<check>Bias or misleading wording</check>
<check>Unintended loopholes for AI misuse</check>
</review_for>
<limitations_statement>
State any limitations the teacher should review before using the assessment.
</limitations_statement>
</self_check>
</assessment_prompt>
</code></pre>
Quick Start (No AI Use Assignment Design)
You are an experienced [GRADE LEVEL] [SUBJECT] teacher designing an assignment aligned to the following learning objective:
Learning Objective:
[Insert objective or standard, the more detailed the better]
AI Use Expectation (Default):
This assignment follows Tier 1 — No AI Use. Students may not use AI for idea generation, drafting, editing, or problem-solving.
Design an assignment that:
- requires original student thinking and work
- includes clear student-facing instructions
- provides criteria for success
- allows the teacher to assess independent understanding
Include:
- task description
- student directions
- success criteria or rubric guidance
Consider adding the following RedLine language to your prompts:
- Do NOT fabricate facts, sources, data, quotes, or research.
- Do NOT include or analyze personally identifiable student information (PII).
- Do NOT write content that undermines academic integrity.
- Do NOT produce unsafe, developmentally inappropriate, or biased content.
- Do NOT provide copyrighted text longer than 90 characters.
Quick Start (AI Use: Tiers 2-5 Assignment Design)
Step 1: Set AI Expectations for This Assignment (Teacher-Only)
Select ONE AI Use Tier
Each tier includes the only AI actions permitted for this assignment.
Tier 1 — No AI Use
☐ Students may not use AI for any part of this assignment.
☐ All thinking, planning, drafting, and editing must be completed independently.
(No AI actions permitted.)
Tier 2 — AI Editing
Students may use AI only for surface-level editing support.
Allowed AI actions:
☐ Correcting grammar and spelling
☐ Formatting citations using student-provided sources
☐ Feedback on organization or structure (no content changes)
Not allowed:
– Idea generation
– Drafting sentences or paragraphs
– Examples, explanations, or content of any kind
Tier 3 — AI Planning
Students may use AI for pre-task planning only.
Allowed AI actions:
☐ Brainstorming ideas
☐ Developing guiding questions
☐ Creating outlines (headings or bullet points only)
☐ Identifying keywords, research questions, or types of sources
Not allowed:
– Draft language or submission-ready text
– AI-written sentences, examples, or explanations
All drafting must be student-written.
Tier 4 — AI + Student Collaboration
Students may use AI as a learning collaborator, with revision and evaluation required.
Allowed AI actions:
☐ Idea generation and outlining
☐ Feedback on clarity, reasoning, or structure
☐ Generating working sentences, examples, or explanations
☐ Suggesting keywords or research questions
☐ Identifying types of reliable sources (summaries optional, teacher-directed)
☐ Compiling short factual notes for possible inclusion
Requirements:
– AI-generated text must be evaluated, revised, and rewritten
– AI output may not appear unchanged in the final submission
– Students must demonstrate AI literacy (bias, limitations, accuracy)
Tier 5 — AI Exploration
Students may use AI for exploration, experimentation, and analysis, with documentation and critique.
Allowed AI actions:
☐ Experimenting with AI capabilities
☐ Generating full explanations or scenarios
☐ Comparing perspectives or solutions
☐ Producing AI-generated content with critique and documentation
Requirements:
– AI-generated content may appear in the final submission only when explicitly allowed
– Student analysis, critique, and reflection are required
Step 2: Include AI Expectations Into the Assignment Template (What Goes to the AI)
You are an experienced [GRADE LEVEL] [SUBJECT] teacher designing an assignment aligned to the following learning objective:
Learning Objective:
[Insert objective or standard]
AI Use Expectations for This Assignment:
Selected AI Tier: [Insert Tier 1 / Tier 2 / Tier 3 / Tier 4 / Tier 5]
Approved AI Expectations: [Paste selected actions here]
Design an assignment that:
- aligns to the learning objective
- requires original student thinking and work
- clearly communicates student-facing AI expectations
- provides criteria for success
- allows the teacher to assess independent understanding
- includes process checks appropriate to the selected AI use
- minimizes opportunities for unacknowledged AI use
If AI use is permitted, include:
- clear documentation expectations for student AI use
- a reflection, justification, or process explanation component
- at least one checkpoint for teacher or peer feedback during the process
Include:
- task description
- student-facing directions (including AI expectations)
- success criteria or rubric guidance
- any recommended process checks aligned to the selected AI tier
Customize & Extend
Role & Audience
You are an expert [GRADE LEVEL] [SUBJECT] teacher designing a high-quality, developmentally appropriate assignment.
The audience includes mixed-ability students: [emerging, proficient, advanced, multilingual learners, and students with accommodations].
Class Context
Use the following context to guide your design:
- Unit or topic: [INSERT]
- Prior learning students have completed: [INSERT]
- Common misconceptions (if known): [OPTIONAL]
- Curriculum or resources used: [TEXTBOOK, LABS, VIDEOS, ETC.]
Learning Objectives & Standards
Align all items to:
- Learning objective(s): [INSERT]
- Standard(s): [INSERT]
AI Use Expectations for This Assignment:
Selected AI Tier: [Insert Tier 1 / Tier 2 / Tier 3 / Tier 4 / Tier 5]
Approved AI Actions: [Paste selected actions here]
Design the assignment so student AI use is strictly limited to the approved actions above and clearly communicated in student-facing directions.
Assignment Design Requirements
Design an assignment that:
- aligns to the stated learning objectives and standards
- requires original student thinking and decision-making
- clearly communicates student-facing AI expectations
- includes criteria for success
- allows the teacher to assess independent understanding
- includes process checks or checkpoints appropriate to the selected AI tier
- minimizes opportunities for unacknowledged AI use
Assignment Components
Include:
- Task description (what students are being asked to do and why)
- Student-facing directions, written in clear, accessible language
- AI expectations section written for students
- Success criteria or rubric guidance aligned to the learning goal
- Process checkpoints, such as planning notes, drafts, reflections, or conferences
If AI use is permitted, also include:
- clear documentation expectations for AI use
- a student reflection or justification component
- at least one opportunity for teacher or peer feedback during the process
Teacher Insight & Instructional Use
Provide guidance for the teacher on:
- what successful student work demonstrates about understanding
- common student struggles to watch for
- 2–3 intervention ideas for students who struggle
- 2–3 enrichment or extension ideas for students who demonstrate mastery
Clarifying Questions (Required)
Before generating the final assignment, ask 3–4 clarifying questions related to:
- content emphasis or depth
- student reading or writing level
- preferred assignment format or product
- accessibility or accommodation needs
Wait for responses before generating the final assignment.
Self-Check
Before finalizing, review the assignment for:
- accuracy and alignment to objectives and standards
- developmental appropriateness
- clarity and accessibility
- alignment with the selected AI tier
- bias, ambiguity, or unintended AI loopholes
State any limitations or design choices the teacher should review before assigning.
Differentiation & Accessibility (Optional Add-Ons)
Create differentiated versions as needed:
- Emerging learners: simplified wording, shorter question stems, guided supports
- Proficient learners: standard grade-level version
- Advanced learners: deeper reasoning, multi-step tasks
- Multilingual learners: glossaries, sentence frames, simplified syntax, visual supports
- SPED / LD: limit reading load per question, avoid double negatives, flag items that may need read-aloud or visual support
- Honors / AP: increase complexity of analysis/evaluation items and include one “justify your reasoning” short-answer item
Accessibility & UDL requirements (optional):
Incorporate accessibility features such as:
- alt text for visuals
- chunked question groups
- predictable formatting
- reduced cognitive load
- optional read-aloud-friendly version
Advanced (XML Format)
<pre><code>
<assignment_prompt version="1.0">
<role_and_audience>
<role>You are an expert [GRADE LEVEL] [SUBJECT] teacher designing a high-quality, developmentally appropriate assignment.</role>
<audience>
<group>mixed-ability students</group>
<learners>
<learner>emerging</learner>
<learner>proficient</learner>
<learner>advanced</learner>
<learner>multilingual learners</learner>
<learner>students with accommodations</learner>
</learners>
</audience>
</role_and_audience>
<class_context>
<unit_or_topic>[INSERT]</unit_or_topic>
<prior_learning_completed>[INSERT]</prior_learning_completed>
<common_misconceptions optional="true">[OPTIONAL]</common_misconceptions>
<curriculum_or_resources_used>[TEXTBOOKS, LABS, READINGS, VIDEOS, TOOLS, ETC.]</curriculum_or_resources_used>
</class_context>
<learning_objectives_and_standards>
<learning_objectives>[INSERT]</learning_objectives>
<standards>[INSERT]</standards>
</learning_objectives_and_standards>
<ai_use_expectations>
<selected_ai_tier>[Insert Tier]</selected_ai_tier>
<approved_ai_actions>
<!-- Paste ONLY the allowed AI actions associated with the selected tier -->
<action>[PASTE ALLOWED ACTION]</action>
<action>[PASTE ALLOWED ACTION]</action>
<action>[PASTE ALLOWED ACTION]</action>
</approved_ai_actions>
<tier_alignment_instruction>
Design the assignment so student AI use is strictly limited to the approved actions above and clearly communicated in student-facing directions.
</tier_alignment_instruction>
</ai_use_expectations>
<assignment_design_requirements>
<must_include>
<requirement>Aligns to the stated learning objectives and standards.</requirement>
<requirement>Requires original student thinking and decision-making.</requirement>
<requirement>Clearly communicates student-facing AI expectations.</requirement>
<requirement>Provides criteria for success.</requirement>
<requirement>Allows the teacher to assess independent understanding.</requirement>
<requirement>Includes process checks or checkpoints appropriate to the selected AI tier.</requirement>
<requirement>Minimizes opportunities for unacknowledged AI use.</requirement>
</must_include>
</assignment_design_requirements>
<assignment_components>
<include>
<component>Task description (what students are being asked to do and why).</component>
<component>Student-facing directions, written in clear, accessible language.</component>
<component>AI expectations section written for students.</component>
<component>Success criteria or rubric guidance aligned to the learning goal.</component>
<component>Process checkpoints (planning notes, drafts, reflections, conferences, etc.).</component>
</include>
<if_ai_use_is_permitted>
<include>
<component>Clear documentation expectations for AI use.</component>
<component>Student reflection or justification component.</component>
<component>At least one opportunity for teacher or peer feedback during the process.</component>
</include>
</if_ai_use_is_permitted>
</assignment_components>
<differentiation_and_accessibility required="true">
<design_expectations>
<expectation>Include options for varied entry points or levels of challenge.</expectation>
<expectation>Include scaffolds for emerging or multilingual learners (sentence frames, examples, chunking).</expectation>
<expectation>Include opportunities for extension or deeper reasoning for advanced learners.</expectation>
<expectation>Include accessibility considerations (reading load, predictable formatting, visuals, optional read-aloud compatibility).</expectation>
</design_expectations>
<!-- Optional teacher-provided specifics to guide differentiation (leave blank if not needed) -->
<teacher_inputs optional="true">
<emerging_learners_supports>[OPTIONAL]</emerging_learners_supports>
<multilingual_supports>[OPTIONAL]</multilingual_supports>
<accommodations>[OPTIONAL]</accommodations>
<advanced_extensions>[OPTIONAL]</advanced_extensions>
<udl_preferences>[OPTIONAL]</udl_preferences>
</teacher_inputs>
</differentiation_and_accessibility>
<teacher_insight_and_instructional_use>
<provide>
<item>What successful student work demonstrates about understanding.</item>
<item>Common student struggles to watch for.</item>
<item>2–3 intervention ideas for students who struggle.</item>
<item>2–3 enrichment or extension ideas for students who demonstrate mastery.</item>
</provide>
</teacher_insight_and_instructional_use>
<clarifying_questions required="true">
<instruction>
Before generating the final assignment, ask 3–4 clarifying questions related to: content emphasis or depth; student reading or writing level; preferred assignment format or product; accessibility or accommodation needs. Wait for responses before generating the final assignment.
</instruction>
<question_count>3-4</question_count>
<topics>
<topic>content emphasis or depth</topic>
<topic>student reading or writing level</topic>
<topic>preferred assignment format or product</topic>
<topic>accessibility or accommodation needs</topic>
</topics>
</clarifying_questions>
<self_check>
<review_for>
<check>Accuracy and alignment to objectives and standards.</check>
<check>Developmental appropriateness.</check>
<check>Clarity and accessibility.</check>
<check>Alignment with the selected AI tier.</check>
<check>Bias, ambiguity, or unintended AI loopholes.</check>
</review_for>
<limitations_statement>
State any limitations or design choices the teacher should review before assigning.
</limitations_statement>
</self_check>
</assignment_prompt>
</code></pre>
By default, this panel is concealed and appears when the user clicks on the section title. Input relevant information about its title using paragraphs or bullet points. Accordions can enhance the user experience when utilized effectively. They allow users to choose what they want to read and disregard the rest. Accordions are often utilized for frequently asked questions (FAQs).
By default, this panel is concealed and appears when the user clicks on the section title. Input relevant information about its title using paragraphs or bullet points. Accordions can enhance the user experience when utilized effectively. They allow users to choose what they want to read and disregard the rest. Accordions are often utilized for frequently asked questions (FAQs).
By default, this panel is concealed and appears when the user clicks on the section title. Input relevant information about its title using paragraphs or bullet points. Accordions can enhance the user experience when utilized effectively. They allow users to choose what they want to read and disregard the rest. Accordions are often utilized for frequently asked questions (FAQs).
